Genomic Testing & Selection Resources for Swine

Fact Sheets

Brief guides for collecting tissue, hair, and blood samples for genetic testing, and a list of genetic tests available for swine.


Sample Collection Guide

Methods for Sample Collection

Note: collection methods may differ based on which genomic test is used. Always check with the company or breed association to determine which sample type is best for submission.

Tissue sampling unit

Tissue Sampling Units (TSUs)

Tissue sampling units, or TSUs, punch a small tissue sample from the ear into a tube with preservation solution.

This sampling procedure can be combined with tagging, when the sample is taken at the same time as the tag is inserted into the ear.

TSUs can be stored at room temperature in a cool, dry place before shipping at room temperature.
Blood tube and blood cards

Whole Blood and Blood Cards

Blood can be collected from a tail or jugular draw into a purple top tube (containing EDTA to prevent clotting). Whole blood should be stored in the fridge and shipped within a few days on ice packs.

Blood can also be spotted onto a FTA blood card covering the entire circle or square on the card, and be sure to let the card dry before storing in a cool, dry place.

Blood cards can be shipped at room temperature.
Hair bulb and storage sheet

Hair Bulbs

Hair should be pulled and not clipped from the animal. First, comb out dirt and loose hairs from the area.

Next, use a clean tool such as pliers to pull 20-30 hairs (about width of a pencil) from the neck or back area. Make sure to get the hair bulbs or roots, as these contain the DNA. Hair can be stored in a cool, dry location and shipped at room temperature.

Sampling Tips

Keep detailed and clear records during sampling to prevent duplicated or skipped animals.

Make sure samples are not contaminated with manure, dirt, and debris.

Clean sampling tools between animals to prevent cross-contamination of DNA.

Store samples out of sunlight and heat, and ship accordingly to prevent DNA degradation.


Genomic Testing Available for Pigs

Test Overview

This information is up-to-date as of August 2025.

TestUC DavisNeogenNational Swine Registry
Parentage$44 (microsatellites)Embedded in bundled testNot offered
Single geneNot offered$40 with report for 10 markers, $35 raw genotypes (GGP Porcine 50K)$25, Hal-1843 only
Breed Composition and ColorNot offeredNot offered$70-210 depending on time of sampling

Single-Gene Test Breakdown

Single-gene or single-SNP tests are generally reported as a genotype represented by a number (0,0 or 0,1 etc.), letters, or as “affected”/”heterozygous”/”clear” depending on the test. A breakdown of single-gene tests including whether the trait is generally favorable or unfavorable is listed in the table below:

Marker IDTrait AssociationFavorable or Unfavorable?
RNRendement Napole, low pH and water holding capacity of porkUnfavorable (animals are more susceptible to RN compared to those without the variant)
HalothanePorcine Stress Syndrome (PSS) and pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) porkUnfavorable (animals are more susceptible to PSS and PSE pork compared to those without variant)
F4 E. coliSusceptibility to E. coli diarrheaUnfavorable (animals are more susceptible to E. coli diarrhea than those without the variant)
MC4RGrowth rate, leanness, feed conversionFavorable (animals likely have increased growth rate, leanness, and feed conversion compared to those without the variant)
CCKARGrowth rateFavorable (animals likely have increased growth rate compared to others without the variant)
PRKAG3Meat quality, high pH and favorable colorFavorable (animals likely have higher pH and better meat color compared to animals without the variant)
CAST249Meat quality, tenderness and juicinessFavorable (animals likely have better pork quality, tenderness, and juiciness compared to animals without the variant)
CAST638Meat quality, tenderness and juicinessFavorable (animals likely have better pork quality, tenderness, and juiciness compared to animals without the variant)
ESRLitter sizeFavorable (animals likely have a greater litter size compared to animals without the variant)
EPORLitter size and uterine capacityFavorable (animals likely have a greater litter size compared to animals without the variant)